Our position on the proposed Orchard Farm development

We’d like to thank everyone who sent Wychavon District Council a response to a planning application for 300 houses on fields next to Tiddesley Wood nature reserve near Pershore.

Making meaningful comments on planning applications is an important part of standing up for Worcestershire’s wildlife and so we were pleased to see many comments about the nature reserve and wildlife impacts among the public response.

The consultation on the application has now closed and so we await the Council’s response in due course. We will provide updates on the situation when we have them.  

Tiddesley Wood is an ancient woodland of such high value for wildlife that it is designated as a nationally important Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). It is also one of the Trust’s most cherished nature reserves. We are, therefore, extremely worried that there is yet another proposal to build on the adjacent land.

The applicants have tried to demonstrate that their proposals will safeguard the wood and that any harm caused by 300 new houses, can be avoided or effectively mitigated. We simply do not believe them.

Our concerns

The Trust’s concerns fall into three main categories.

1. There are several technical shortcomings in the documents presented by the applicants. We believe that they underplay the harm likely to be caused by the proposed development while overestimating the effectiveness of their mitigation.
2. We do not accept that the proposed mitigation will offset the harm caused by increased recreational pressure in Tiddesley Wood SSSI. While we welcome visitors to our nature reserve, we are already seeing the adverse impacts of excessive recreational pressure. Paths are widened by trampling, new and unauthorised paths are destroying valuable habitat, dog fouling and dogs off leads are impacting wildlife and the nature reserve also suffers from anti-social behaviour.  Essentially, we believe that the reserve is now at capacity for the number of visitors it can absorb.
3. We do not agree that their proposed ‘buffer’ planting alongside the woodland will be a meaningful addition to Tiddesley Wood SSSI. It will take many years to mature and will always be affected by noise, light and domestic pets. 

It is likely that the additional harm will be incremental and continuous whereas any mitigation put forward by the applicants will essentially be set-in-stone when Wychavon District Council make their decision. If, as is very likely, the SSSI habitats do decline following development, despite the applicant’s proposed mitigation, our capacity to undo that harm will be severely limited and the wildlife in the SSSI will diminish accordingly.

As we have made clear many times before, we do not believe that the harmful effects of building so close to the wood could ever be effectively mitigated in line with legal and planning policy requirements. With that in mind we are once again restating our very strong objection to proposed development of this site.

Read our formal response to the Orchard Farm planning application and our formal response to the updated information for Orchard Farm planning application

Taken together, these issues mean that we do not believe that the application can demonstrate legal and policy compliance. The law suggests that any planning permission here would need to demonstrate that the SSSI would be protected and enhanced. We do not believe that that could ever be the case. Planning policy also requires effective mitigation of wildlife harm and again, we do not think that can be achieved here. 

Background

This follows on from years of work on the South Worcestershire Development Plan Review (SWDPR) during which we, along with other stakeholders including Natural England and local people, sought to safeguard the wood through the Local Plan process. Our comments and the voices of many others provided the evidence needed for the councils to remove the allocation (for development) of Orchard Farm from the emerging Plan last year, a move that we consider to be essential if we are to protect the adjacent wood and its wildlife and one that we fully supported.

The Government has repeatedly made clear that development must be plan-led, in other words guided by local plan policy. The local councils and their emerging Local Plan do not support development here and so it should not be allowed to happen.

Perhaps more importantly, this battle is not just about one SSSI. The protection of precious places like Tiddesley Wood is essential. If we are to meet the Government’s stated commitment to protect 30% of the UK’s land by 2030, and assist with nature’s recovery, we must protect the best remaining fragments of our natural heritage, reducing pressure on them and seeking to expand and join them up. This is a well understood ecological principle known as ‘more, bigger, better and joined up’ that was set out in the Government-sponsored review ‘Making space for nature’: a review of England's wildlife sites.

The bigger picture

Although the development may also have detrimental impacts on the Trust as owners of the wood, our position is based on our concerns about the adverse ecological impacts on a SSSI. It follows the same guiding principles that we use in all our planning comments across the county and will continue to do so as this case evolves.

We will continue to object to this proposal and we hope that the strength of argument against development here will lead to a refusal of the planning application. 

You can find out more about how to respond to planning applications in our helpful Planning for Biodiversity guide.

Updated 20th February 2024